tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-759178030677978044.post3075967932139849736..comments2024-02-19T07:24:42.397-08:00Comments on Anglican Curmudgeon: Judges Who Are Indifferent to InjusticeA. S. Haleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05108498446058643166noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-759178030677978044.post-23552651045470054042017-11-03T12:25:03.006-07:002017-11-03T12:25:03.006-07:00Please forgive. We have been distracted by variou...Please forgive. We have been distracted by various deaths and illnesses in the near family. Counterbalancing such things we have also been delivered of a sister of Mary....our newest granddaughter Sage Aurora Newton.<br /><br /> We are pretty much worn out....but we wish to advise all that there are many who back our Rabbi....in his history, his theology, and in his willingness to shepherd this flock....those of us who follow his wisdom.<br /> If it is of interest....the fellow grandparents and others of my boss's life and my orbit...have declared that Our Rabbi is their guide....not to a strange sect....but to the truth of the ancient Orthodoxy.....some of these people are yet in their 30s.<br /><br /> My own children have come to the realisation that celebration of the ancient rites are not only pleasant, but even necessary exorcisms of our sins. THEY WERE LECTURING ME.<br /><br /> Almighty Father, we who have err'd and stray'd from Thy ways like lost sheep, and followed too much in the devices and desires of thine own Heart, have mercy upon us.......<br /><br />Listen to the reason of our Rabbi....our professor of law and religion......<br /><br />Please stay in.<br /><br />El Gringo ViejoDavid Christian Newtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02486433908063462273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-759178030677978044.post-91525888989976705782017-10-19T14:05:02.129-07:002017-10-19T14:05:02.129-07:00Its a blow to the Rule of Law that a travesty of j...Its a blow to the Rule of Law that a travesty of justice and the failure of a jurist to recuse herself from an OBVIOUS conflict of interest, is now to be compounded by attempts to cover up, obfuscate and proffer false argument. Does the High Court of South Carolina have any integrity at all? This is another bump on the slippery slope of relativism...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09769573084488400248noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-759178030677978044.post-20371383645098895772017-10-12T15:45:52.982-07:002017-10-12T15:45:52.982-07:00The corruption in this process is demeaning to the...The corruption in this process is demeaning to the SC Supreme Court and to the people of the state.Katherinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03553894154841373604noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-759178030677978044.post-85659887085526886962017-10-11T08:36:33.208-07:002017-10-11T08:36:33.208-07:00Many thanks, sir. I appreciate your efforts in ex...Many thanks, sir. I appreciate your efforts in explaining all these nuances.Galletta Nebelunghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07152194351063708303noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-759178030677978044.post-68915531595505268252017-10-11T08:31:14.343-07:002017-10-11T08:31:14.343-07:00Galletta Nibelung, St. Anne's is not a party t...Galletta Nibelung, St. Anne's is not a party to the case, but St. Anne's is a constituent of ECSC, which is a party. And ECSC stands to end up with $500 million of property thanks to Justice Hearn's vote, so St. Anne's will directly benefit as a member of that organization, even if it does not take over the property of St. Paul's Conway.<br /><br />As for Justice Hearn, Prof. Adams is stating his opinion on a conclusion of law, about which he has not been informed by his clients. ECUSA is an unincorporated association organized at common law (<i>i.e.,</i> not organized under the laws of any one particular State). As such, it takes its rights and obligations in South Carolina from South Carolina law. That law provides that the members of an unincorporated association are liable for any judgment against the association. Under ECUSA's Canons, as a member in good standing of her Episcopal parish of St. Anne's, Justice Hearn is a member of ECUSA as well. So as far as ECUSA is concerned under South Carolina law, Justice Hearn <b>is</b> a party to the case, because ECUSA is.<br /><br />Moreover, she will benefit financially from her decision in two ways: since the diocese she is in will be far richer than ever before, it will not be dependent on her or her husband's pledges, and she and her husband will (if CJ Beatty does not change his opinion) benefit from using the facilities of Camp St. Christopher along with the rest of her parish. But the fact that under SC law she is a party to the action is enough to disqualify her from sitting in judgment on her own case.A. S. Haleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05108498446058643166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-759178030677978044.post-86683653175691596462017-10-10T16:01:13.973-07:002017-10-10T16:01:13.973-07:00In reading the affidavit by Gregory Adams, he stat...In reading the affidavit by Gregory Adams, he states that neither St. Anne's nor the Hearns are party to this case. If my poor understanding of the law is correct, they do stand to benefit from the outcome from of the case. Kind Curmudgeon, please correct any misstatement.Galletta Nebelunghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07152194351063708303noreply@blogger.com