tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-759178030677978044.post5717316485253523075..comments2024-02-19T07:24:42.397-08:00Comments on Anglican Curmudgeon: The Church of EnablersA. S. Haleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05108498446058643166noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-759178030677978044.post-14375179082599079332008-11-07T10:45:00.000-08:002008-11-07T10:45:00.000-08:00Bishop Bruno can only be speaking, UP, of the "Cal...Bishop Bruno can only be speaking, UP, of the "California constitutional right to marry" as "found" (not in the Constitution, but made up out of whole cloth) by four intellectually superior minds on the California Supreme Court, as compared to their three intellectual inferiors who, try as they might, just could not find any such "right" in the written language.<BR/><BR/>As I showed above, what the four "found" is not a "right," but a State-granted privilege. But by calling it a "right", they managed to impose a "duty" on all the rest of us to acknowledge their collective wisdom. The trouble is, the people in their common sense would have none of it.A. S. Haleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05108498446058643166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-759178030677978044.post-22298214033192596602008-11-07T07:04:00.000-08:002008-11-07T07:04:00.000-08:00Bishop Bruno claimed there are "constitutional rig...Bishop Bruno claimed there are "constitutional rights" that are being "unfairly targeted." <BR/><BR/>Is he speaking of U.S. or Californian constitutional rights, and where in either constitution is this written?Undergroundpewsterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10182191422663119484noreply@blogger.com